Sunday, April 13, 2008

The Great Threat/Opportunity

It has been a bumpy ride for AAPL in 2008. I don't think most people would ever vision this at 01/01/2008.

It's a proof, however, on average AAPL investor's style (including those institutional ones), i.e., more emotional than the general market. I clearly remember the day when AAPL was 117 in 2008. If some VP had not come out to clarify that they still on track for shipping 10 million iPhone, it could go another dive that day (the general market was more than -1%).

Fast forward to today, AAPL has since recovered to 146 (which it reached about 159 before falling down along with GE and the market). If you look at the graph, you would see a potential cup and handle pattern is getting into perfection. I don't believe that shit however. If I'm looking at it, it's because too many investors react to that and have some short-term effect on stock price.

Right now investors' eyes are on the coming 04/23 when the 2Q result will be posted. It's extremely difficult to predict the difference between investor's expectations versus the real result. A general guideline is that some ipod disappointment has been priced in, but people are looking for some meaningful iPhone and Mac growth. (this is another puzzle to me, back in mid-late last year I already said the iPod pure music player market is pretty much saturated in US, yet it seems average investors are assuming it'll still grow like crazy. 1Q disappointment in units shipped is really no surprise to me, but bang, I'm surprised by the market!) 

Currently there are two important indicators if you are paying attention to some details. On Apple's US site. It has best selling rating on different product lines (it used to aggregate all together which gave me much clearer idea, but alas, it's now categorized and thus more encrypted). MacBook Air sitting the top place SINCE IT'S INTRODUCED! I clearly remember Apple TV was top of the list for only two weeks after announcement. Now there are two possible explanations: either MacBook Air is doing extremely well; or other Macs are doing extremely poor. I think the former is more realistic. Even if other Macs are not doing well because of the market, given the fact MacBook Air is targeted as a niche product, you can realize how successful it has been. (I have to pointed out, it's NOT the first time that when Apple introduced some product, investors don't like it, but consumers loves it). Also given the higher selling price, MacBook Air should provide meaningful boost to Apple's Mac line in this Quarter. 

iPod line's sequence is interesting. It's Nano, Touch, Classic, Shuffle. I can tell you right now is that Shuffle is doing awful, even after the price cuts. It'll impact the units shipped big time. On the other hand, iPod touch is doing great, which should push the average selling price up for iPod line further. Overall though I think investors will still be disappointed by iPod section (yet they shouldn't). Talking about iPod line, I do believe the initiative to transform it to a mobile wifi device presents new opportunities. My boss who's a tech guru and keep shutting out Apple is now considering an iPod touch since it's the only mobile web device that has capable web surfing. And between my wife and I, we use iPod touch much more on web surfing than listening to music.

I have no way to tell about iPhone since there is only one product :-( . But let me put this way, after SDK is announced, I become a firm believer that it'll be a global hit, just matter of time. It take iPod that many years, it shouldn't take that long for iPhone.

The general US market won't be pretty for years to come. Yet AAPL is still a growth story if you believe me. Such belief cannot be deduced from some financial statements. It comes from the deep understanding of what AAPL is capable of and who are doing the hard work in Infinite Loop 1st. When I saw some news about some other wireless carrier tried to push out iPhone competitors and some magazine review puts iPhone 2nd place in terms of the best wireless device, I just shrugged with a "good luck" to them. It's not difficult, it's impossible. Besides, you think AAPL would sit on iPhone without improving it in years to come? When Jobs said iPhone is 4-5 years lead over competitors, he's not joking.

Patient AAPL investors will be rewarded. The case that can be written into Harvard MBA course is not over yet.

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

AAPL's good/bad day

How can one explain the behavior of AAPL investors? It's a mystery. On one hand, investors seems to be imagining the bright future and thus paying a high premium (second only to Google in tech industry); on the other hand, the same group of investors can easily be scared and fled in seconds. I clearly remember same thing happened last year when the first quarter result is announced and a lower-than-expected forecast is made. This time, the magnitude is enlarged by the general market and we saw a share price slide in after-hour trading.

Anyway, I will have a quite sizable paper loss for days/weeks/months to come. It won't change my opinion about AAPL in next 5 years. I do worry about my options, some of which will expire in one year. I may need to convert them to 2-year expiration to cushion for such crazy investor reactions.

To say I wasn't feeling bad is not true. Paper loss is still loss. Yet I'm confident AAPL is on its way still, it will weather through the storm.

Sunday, January 13, 2008

A Drying Fishing Pond - GS/LEH/C/JPM/MS

It's getting hard to pick a future winner in this confusing investment environment. There are contradictory information everyday, each day's information negates yesterday's information.


There are two types of opportunities, one being individual, the other being environmental. The credit-crunch starting with sub-prime mortgage crisis presents a challenge to the financial industry, especially the investment banking industry. This industry contains some big names that normally would remind people of white-collar high-pay and highly-respected professionals. Yet all has changed after the crisis began to unfold in the latter half of 2007. There is no reason to believe things will get better until maybe late 2008. Before that, the tides will still be retreating regardless how hard those naked people try to cover themselves, until they are all exposed.


GS/LEH/C/JPM/MS are within the same pond, yet with different wisdom and positions. GS has proven itself again truly the best of the best.


If individual investor want to get some result, the only logic that'll work is based on two things: 1. one needs to believe the investment banking industry will still exist and will still prosperous; 2. if one cannot understand the complexity in the industry, the most efficient way is parallel comparison.


I don't think I have the capability to compete with investment corporation's analysis force to understand every bit details of, say, GS' income stream and client base and future growth, etc. All I can do is to compare GS with other folks in the same pond. And with that, I'll stick to what Warren Buffet would be happy to begin with: balance sheet (financial statements) in the previous 5 years.


Preliminary Result:

  • Banking industry is highly leveraged since their cost of product is “borrowed money”. Thus for, liquidity can be measured for its sustainable life symptom and any ratios related to equity can be measured for its performance.

  • GS/LEH stands out with consistent high ROE and high current ratio.

  • MS is most highly leveraged with D/E ratio above 30 in 2006. Combine with the news we know, we can feel how greed is driving their revenue and back-fired on them. Yet, if without the sub-prime mortgage crisis, figure wise it should be comparable to GS and LEH.

  • JPM is hopelessly struggling with liquidity. For every dollar of sales, in 2006 it has almost $2 short of current asset when compared to current liability. I don't understand how it can live that long! Even before the sub-prime mortgage became apparent, its “health status” is coming down.

  • C feels big and slow and conservative (this, however, is not equivalent to shrewdness, C still is tainted with sub-prime mortgage)


GS/LEH should and will survive the current financial crisis and keep going.

GS 198.74 as of 1/11/08

LEH 58.15 as of 1/11/08